• 3 Ways Fictions That Shape Our Reality: Insights from ‘Homo Deus’
    Conceptual illustration showing a human surrounded by glowing, interconnected abstract symbols of money, law, and the state, representing the fictions that shape our reality.
    Conceptual illustration showing a human surrounded by glowing, interconnected abstract symbols of money, law, and the state, representing the fictions that shape our reality.

    3 Ways Fictions That Shape Our Reality: Insights from ‘Homo Deus’

    After being deeply impressed by Yuval Noah Harari’s profound insights into humanity in Sapiens, I naturally picked up his following book, Homo Deus. Harari, a historian with deep knowledge of biology and psychology, offers a captivating perspective on what makes us human.

    The central theme that captivated me was his exploration of the fictions that shape our reality. What is the fundamental reason Homo sapiens became the dominant species on Earth? It wasn’t just fire, intelligence, or language. According to Harari, the secret lies in our unique ability to imagine and collectively believe in these powerful stories.

    This shared belief in unseen things enabled unprecedented cooperation between strangers. Belief became the powerful glue holding thousands together, allowing humanity to rule the planet. But what exactly are these fictions that shape our reality, and how do they govern our lives today?

    1. Defining the Fictions That Shape Our Reality

    When we hear the word “fiction,” we might think of novels. However, Harari uses a more technical term: “social reality” or “intersubjective reality.”

    Nations, laws, money, human rights, corporations, and stocks—almost everything that structures our modern lives is made of these unseen fictions that shape our reality. None of these have a physical form you can touch, yet they act as powerful chains, compelling us to abide by them.

    We go to work daily not because of physical laws, but because we believe in the fiction of an ’employment contract’—a mutually agreed-upon social arrangement. Human life is governed not just by biological survival, but by these powerful shared imaginations.

    2. The Power of Social Reality: Indulgences and Crusades

    To understand the immense power of these fictions, we can look at history. In the Middle Ages, the Catholic Church was the dominant “social reality.”

    Because the local priest was often the sole intellectual authority, the majority desperately believed in the fiction of a painless afterlife. The Church, understanding this desire, utilized two powerful fictions to shape the reality of the era:

    • Indulgences: The brilliant “business idea” of selling certificates that forgave sins, turning spiritual anxiety into financial profit for the Church.
    • The Crusades: By propagating the fiction that killing “infidels” guaranteed a spot in heaven, the Church launched massive wars. Countless people marched to Jerusalem for salvation, guided by a story rather than physical necessity.
    Historical illustration of a large crusader army marching towards Jerusalem, demonstrating the power of shared beliefs as fictions that shape reality.
    Historical illustration of a large crusader army marching towards Jerusalem, demonstrating the power of shared beliefs as fictions that shape reality.

    Did common people join the Crusades purely out of religious fervor? Perhaps some did. But for powerless lords or those suffering in hopeless reality, the fiction of “a new land of opportunity with guaranteed salvation” was an incredibly attractive escape. These historical events were successful policies enacted by a minority that masterfully understood and exploited the fictions that shape our reality at the time.

    As Saladin replies in the movie Kingdom of Heaven when asked what Jerusalem is worth: “Nothing… Everything.” It is physically nothing, but as a shared fiction, it is everything.

    3. Navigating the Stories That Govern Our Lives

    The Crusades may seem distant, but the structure where an “unseen story” moves the world is still at play today, perhaps even more subtly. Has the faith of the Middle Ages simply changed form into nationalism, capitalism, or ideology?

    We are still deeply bound by invisible “social reality.” We must recognize that we are living within fictions that shape our reality even today. The question Homo Deus ultimately poses is this: Are you consciously choosing the story that governs your life, or are you merely an actor on a stage built by others?

    The first step is recognizing that these are stories, not physical realities. We must ask: “Who benefits from this story?” and “What do I gain or lose by believing it?” We cannot live without stories like money or laws. The key is to have the wisdom to discern which fictions that shape our reality empower us, and which ones ensnare us.

    Further Reading for Context

  • The Dark Side of Dominance: 3 Insights on “The Power of Shared Myths” (from Sapiens)
    A sweeping illustration of thousands of early humans united under glowing abstract symbols of cooperation, law, and global unity, building a massive glowing city structure, representing the power of shared myths.
    A sweeping illustration of thousands of early humans united under glowing abstract symbols of cooperation, law, and global unity, building a massive glowing city structure, representing the power of shared myths.

    The Dark Side of Dominance: 3 Insights on “The Power of Shared Myths”

    Growing up, I encountered many stories explaining why humans dominate Earth. Some claimed we were the “chosen species” gifted with superior rationality. Others pointed to our communication skills. As someone who casually enjoys a good steak at the top of the food chain, I just felt lucky.

    Yet, nature documentaries challenge this view. Monkeys use vocalizations for social bonding, and ants use pheromones for complex societal organization. If language isn’t unique to us, was it our rational brain that secured victory?

    My experience writing about psychology suggests otherwise. Human choices are deeply mediated by emotion-based memories, often powerless against immediate pleasures like scrolling through our phones. How did a species often far from rational come to rule the world? Yuval Noah Harari’s Sapiens offers profound answers, centering on the power of shared myths.

    1. The Survivor: Sapiens vs. Neanderthals

    We often forget that Homo sapiens was just one of several human species evolved from Australopithecus in East Africa about 2.5 million years ago.

    We coexisted with species like Homo erectus and the formidable Neanderthals in Europe. Neanderthals were stronger, larger, and better adapted to cold than our ancestors. Early sapiens, with fragile skin and weak natural weapons, were often prey until mastering fire about 800,000 years ago.

    Yet, about 10,000 years ago, Homo sapiens became the last human species standing. How did we outcompete our stronger siblings?

    2. The Secret Weapon: The Power of Shared Myths

    Early human groups typically split when exceeding 50 members due to social friction. Yet, Sapiens learned to form stable collectives of 150 or thousands.

    The secret lies in abstraction. As discussed in books like Seven and a Half Lessons About the Brain, Sapiens possesses the unique ability to imagine and believe in things that do not physically exist. This capacity for abstraction is the foundation of the power of shared myths.

    This evolutionary leap enabled cooperation between strangers who shared the same beliefs. Nations, human rights, money, and laws have no physical existence. They exist only in our collective imagination, forming an undeniable “social reality.” This power bound vast numbers of Sapiens together, allowing them to dominate the planet and eventually drive sibling species to extinction.

    3. The Trap of the Agricultural Revolution

    Historical painting showing the construction of a pyramid, contrasting exhausted laborers pulling massive stones under overseers' whips with a pharaoh and nobles feasting in comfort, depicting social hierarchy.
    Historical painting showing the construction of a pyramid, contrasting exhausted laborers pulling massive stones under overseers’ whips with a pharaoh and nobles feasting in comfort, depicting social hierarchy.

    However, this human success wasn’t always beautiful. As massive numbers gathered, a stable food supply became critical, leading to the Agricultural Revolution. While it allowed for a population boom, it was a trap for the individual.

    Ancient hunter-gatherers were generalists with exceptional mental and physical agility. Agriculture turned most humans into specialized laborers, tending fields in repetitive routines. Society became like a vast factory, increasing overall wealth but creating deep information asymmetry.

    In this new “social reality,” wealth flowed to a small elite (kings, priests) who produced the myths. This structure persists today. The tools have changed, but the power of shared myths still maintains a system where a top echelon possesses most wealth.

    The Illusion of Equality and Recognizing Reality

    This isn’t just politics; it’s biology. True biological equality is difficult when hormones like serotonin drive us to compare status and feel hierarchy. Humans used imagination to formalize this animalistic hierarchy into extreme, legally sanctioned systems.

    Realizing this “social reality” was a turning point for me. I saw my former military service not just as noble duty, but potentially as the sacrifice of lower-class individuals to maintain a hierarchy. It wasn’t beautiful. The moment my individual life became precious, I left.

    Reading Sapiens made me realize we cannot escape being “social animals” bound by the power of shared myths. But recognizing this reality is the first step toward understanding our position and struggling to change our lives. Sapiens is daunting, but I recommend it—unless you are completely content with your current life.

    Further Reading for Context

  • The #1 Psychology Rule: Understanding “Loss Aversion in Everyday Life”
    A behavioral economics value function graph illustrating how the steepness of the loss curve represents loss aversion in everyday life.
    A behavioral economics value function graph illustrating how the steepness of the loss curve represents loss aversion in everyday life.

    Why We Act: Understanding “Loss Aversion in Everyday Life” (from Misbehaving)

    As a blogger, I constantly ponder one question: How can I get more people to read my posts? Like many, I researched SEO and heard that selecting the right “keywords” based on search volume is crucial.

    However, despite my efforts with keyword analysis, I rarely achieved the high view counts I hoped for. Frustrated, I turned away from technical manuals and toward books on psychology and the humanities. I realized that understanding human nature is fundamental to understanding why people click.

    A book I recently finished, Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics by Richard Thaler, explains human psychology in an exceptionally intuitive way. Today, I want to share key insights from the book, specifically focusing on loss aversion in everyday life.

    The Pain of Loss > The Joy of Gain

    Imagine someone offers you a coin toss. If it’s heads, you win $1,000. Would you take the bet? Most people, myself included, would say yes.

    Now, what if the deal changes? Heads, you win $1,000; tails, you lose $1,000. Would you still do it? Suddenly, the hesitation kicks in.

    I used to think people were primarily motivated by benefits. But when you think calmly, a gain is “nice to have,” but you can live without it. However, losing something precious sparks anger and fear. The pleasure of satisfaction is not equal to the pain of loss.

    Behavioral economics introduces a “value function graph” to illustrate this. The curve showing the pain of losing $1,000 is much steeper than the curve showing the joy of gaining $1,000. This psychological phenomenon is known as loss aversion.

    How Loss Aversion in Everyday Life Drives Action

    This concept isn’t just about money; it applies deeply to human relationships and our daily actions.

    I once wrote a blog post about the controversial topic of male-female friendships. Why are people so invested in this issue? It’s because of the anxiety related to the potential loss of a partner or a friend. People who fear losing something are driven to act urgently.

    Whole industries are built on leveraging loss aversion in everyday life. Insurance is a prime example—paying to prevent a potential future loss. Even on my blog, posts related to preventing mistakes or losses tend to get more views. The human psychology that prioritized safety for survival over hundreds of thousands of years is still active today.

    A split illustration showing hesitation over a small coffee price increase versus easy spending on a large meal, demonstrating diminishing sensitivity in everyday life.
    A split illustration showing hesitation over a small coffee price increase versus easy spending on a large meal, demonstrating diminishing sensitivity in everyday life.

    Why Small Things Matter More: Diminishing Sensitivity

    The insights from the value function graph don’t stop at loss aversion. Look at the slope of the curve—it flattens as the amounts get larger.

    This explains why the negative feeling of a $10 item increasing to $20 is much more intense than a $100 item increasing to $110. It perfectly explains my own behavior: I hesitate when my usual $1.20 coffee is sold out and I have to buy a $2.50 alternative, yet I don’t blink when choosing a $39 delivery meal over a $35 one.

    This concept, known as diminishing sensitivity, also explains why we often feel greater satisfaction from small, simple pleasures. We experience joy and sorrow more intensely over things of smaller initial value. This holds true in relationships, too. I have deeper, more lasting impressions of people who showed consideration in small details than of those who treated me to expensive meals once.

    Reading this back, it seems obvious. Yet, I’ve come to feel there is a huge difference between “knowing” something and “actively using” that knowledge. Understanding loss aversion in everyday life has motivated me to organize these thoughts and share them with you.

    Thank you for reading, and I hope you have a day without any losses.

    Further Reading for Context